Grammarly (AI) Review: What It Does, Pricing, and Alternatives

Draft v0.1 — 2026-05-22 KST; promoted to content_status = qa_passed after the 2026-05-22 official plans page-body read. Generated from templates/tool-page-template.md. Passed Section A of qa/adsense-seo-quality-gate.md; later source-freshness updates are recorded in the update log. Meta description (≤ 155 chars): Grammarly's writing assistant adds generative AI on top of grammar, clarity, and tone suggestions — here is what it does, who it fits, and where to look elsewhere.

Quick verdict

• Best for: people who want real-time writing assistance inside the apps where they already type — browser fields, email clients, documents — rather than copy-pasting into a separate chat app.
• Not ideal for: users who want a general-purpose chatbot or a coding assistant.
• Pricing model: freemium. Free plan at $0, Pro at $12/month, and Enterprise on Contact Sales pricing — verified on grammarly.com/plans on 2026-05-22.
• Free plan: yes — the Free plan ($0/month) includes 100 generative-AI prompts per month plus core grammar and tone features; Pro raises this to 2,000 prompts per member per month and Enterprise lists unlimited prompts. Verified on grammarly.com/plans 2026-05-22.
• Last verified: 2026-05-22 (grammarly.com/plans page-body read)

Source-freshness note (2026-06-13)

If you are weighing Grammarly (AI), the useful frame is that Grammarly presents it as an in-workflow writing and review surface — AI assistance that shows up inside the apps where you already write (browser fields, email, documents) rather than a separate chat product you switch into. Grammarly's official AI product page (grammarly.com/ai, titled "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly") returned HTTP 200 on a 2026-06-13 KST recheck.

• Workflow fit. Grammarly's AI page positions the product around AI-assisted writing and communication that lives where you already type — proofreading, rewriting, and drafting inside your existing tools. The question that matters is whether the writing you want assisted already happens in those surfaces, not whether it is the chattiest assistant. Evaluate it against how your team actually writes and reviews day to day.
• Keep a human in the review loop. Grammarly's suggestions and generated text are a draft layer, not a final decision. Read and edit what it proposes before you send it — especially for anything sensitive — rather than accepting changes wholesale.
• Verify plans on the official page. Grammarly's official plans page (grammarly.com/plans, titled "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly") was confirmed reachable (HTTP 200) in the same 2026-06-13 KST pass, showing the Free, Pro, and Enterprise tier names; specific amounts were not disclosed on the page itself. Plan structure and quotas shift over time, so confirm current pricing and plan entitlements directly on that page.
• Vendor evidence only. These are Grammarly's own official pages — durable positioning and reachability evidence, not an independent ranking.

Source-backed freshness note drawn from Grammarly's own official product and plans pages. No benchmark, ranking, price, quota, plan-entitlement, speed, model-availability, or superiority claim is made here; vendor positioning is reported as vendor evidence only.

Source-freshness note (2026-06-19)

A 2026-06-19 KST recheck confirms Grammarly's own official surfaces for evaluating it yourself are reachable and stable. The AI product page (grammarly.com/ai, titled "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly", HTTP 200), the plans page (grammarly.com/plans, titled "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", HTTP 200), and the business/teams page (grammarly.com/business, titled "Grammarly for Business | AI Writing Assistance for Teams of all Sizes", h1 "Grammarly for Teams & Businesses", HTTP 200) all loaded as full pages in the same pass.

• Individual vs. team are separate surfaces. Grammarly keeps a personal/Pro surface and a teams/business surface. The business page positions Grammarly as AI writing assistance for teams of all sizes — so if you are buying for a group rather than yourself, evaluate that surface (admin, deployment, and team fit) on its own page rather than inferring it from the individual plans.
• Verify plans and entitlements at the source. Plan names, prices, generative-AI quotas, and which tier includes what shift between releases. Read them on Grammarly's official plans and business pages rather than trusting any figure — including the ones quoted lower on this page — once it is more than ~90 days old.
• Keep a human in the review loop. Grammarly's suggestions and generated text are a draft layer, not a final decision. Read and edit what it proposes before you send it — especially for anything sensitive — rather than accepting changes wholesale. The vendor's positioning is not a guarantee about any specific output.
• Vendor evidence only. These are Grammarly's own official pages, confirming the AI, plans, and business surfaces are reachable — not an independent ranking or benchmark.

Source-backed freshness note: a reachability/title/h1 recheck of Grammarly's own AI, plans, and business pages on 2026-06-19 KST. No price, quota, plan-entitlement, model-availability, benchmark, ranking, speed, accuracy, or superiority claim is made here; volatile specifics are routed to the official site, and vendor positioning is reported as vendor evidence only.

Source-freshness note (2026-06-25)

If your buying question spans both an individual in-workflow writing/review surface and a team/enterprise review path, a 2026-06-25 KST official-source gate confirms Grammarly's own pages for evaluating that yourself are reachable. The AI product page (grammarly.com/ai, titled "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly", HTTP 200), the plans page (grammarly.com/plans, titled "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", h1 "Great Writing Starts With a Plan", HTTP 200), the business/teams page (grammarly.com/business, titled "Grammarly for Business | AI Writing Assistance for Teams of all Sizes", h1 "Grammarly for Teams & Businesses", HTTP 200), and the enterprise page (grammarly.com/enterprise, which resolves to grammarly.com/business/enterprise, titled "Grammarly for Enterprise", h1 "For Enterprise", HTTP 200) all loaded as full pages in the same pass.

• Writing surface vs. review path are different decisions. Grammarly's AI page positions the product as in-workflow writing and review assistance that shows up where you already type. The business and enterprise pages are a separate buying surface for teams — admin, deployment, and organization-wide rollout. If you are buying for a group, evaluate those pages on their own rather than inferring team fit from the individual surface.
• Verify plans, entitlements, and security at the source. Plan names, generative-AI quotas, which tier includes what, and any admin/security terms shift between releases. Read them on Grammarly's official plans, business, and enterprise pages rather than trusting any figure — including the ones quoted lower on this page — once it is more than ~90 days old.
• Keep a human in the review loop. Grammarly's suggestions and generated text are a draft layer, not a final decision. Read and edit what it proposes before you send it — especially for anything sensitive — rather than accepting changes wholesale. The vendor's positioning is not a guarantee about any specific output.
• Vendor evidence only. These are Grammarly's own official pages, confirming the AI, plans, business, and enterprise surfaces are reachable — not an independent ranking or benchmark.

Source-backed freshness note: a reachability/title/h1 recheck of Grammarly's own AI, plans, business, and enterprise pages on 2026-06-25 KST. No price, quota, plan-entitlement, model-availability, benchmark, ranking, speed, accuracy, or superiority claim is made here; volatile specifics are routed to the official site, and vendor positioning is reported as vendor evidence only.

What is Grammarly (AI)?

Grammarly is a writing assistant originally known for grammar and spelling checking. The product has expanded over time to cover clarity, tone, brand voice, and — more recently — generative AI features that can draft, rewrite, summarize, or shorten text on demand. The "Grammarly AI" surface adds those generative features on top of the existing writing-assistant layer.

Grammarly works as a browser extension, an in-app integration with major editors and email clients, native desktop apps for Windows and macOS, and mobile keyboards. The official AI feature page lives at https://www.grammarly.com/ai. Because Grammarly is embedded inside other apps, its UX strength is showing up where you already write, not pulling you into a separate window.

• Vendor: Grammarly Inc.
• Official homepage: https://www.grammarly.com/ai
• Category: AI Writing & Editing (secondary: AI Productivity & Automation)

Main use cases

• Use case 1 — Real-time grammar and clarity suggestions: while you type in Gmail, Google Docs, Word, Slack, or a browser form, Grammarly highlights grammar, clarity, and conciseness issues with one-click accept suggestions.
• Use case 2 — Tone and style adjustment for emails and docs: asking Grammarly to make a draft sound more formal, friendlier, more confident, or shorter, without re-typing the whole thing.
• Use case 3 — Generative drafting and rewriting: generating a first draft from a short instruction (an email reply, a summary of a longer doc, a quick announcement) directly in the apps where you write, instead of switching to a separate chat tool.

Pricing and plans

The values below were read directly from grammarly.com/plans on 2026-05-22 KST. Grammarly's plan naming and generative-AI quotas have shifted across releases, so reconfirm with the official page before quoting these numbers more than ~90 days from now.

• Free — $0/month. Includes grammar and spelling, writing tone signal, and 100 generative-AI prompts per month. Tone adjustment, sentence rewrites, and English fluency features are listed as not included in Free.
• Pro — $12/month. Adds tone and rewrite suggestions and lifts the generative-AI quota to 2,000 prompts per member per month.
• Enterprise — Contact Sales pricing. Lists unlimited generative-AI prompts per member per month plus admin and security controls.

When evaluating Grammarly for an organization, also verify directly:

• The current per-tier generative-AI quota (the limits above were quoted on 2026-05-22 and can change).
• Whether brand voice / style guide features remain Enterprise-tier.
• Admin controls and SSO availability.
• Data-handling policy specifically for generative AI inputs and outputs.

Source: live page-body read of https://www.grammarly.com/plans on 2026-05-22 KST. Discounts (student, education) and regional pricing variants were not in scope of this fetch.

Pros

• Lives inside the apps where most writing already happens; no copy/paste loop required.
• Combines a stable grammar/clarity layer with newer generative drafting, which can reduce the number of separate tools a writer needs.
• Mature browser, desktop, and mobile presence makes adoption smoother for non-technical users.

Cons and caveats

• For deep, structured drafting (long memos, technical docs, research) a dedicated assistant like Claude or ChatGPT will usually feel more capable than Grammarly's in-line generative surface.
• Grammar suggestions are heuristic. Accepting all suggestions blindly can flatten a writer's voice. Treat them as a second pass, not a rule.
• Text typed into Grammarly is processed by Grammarly's models. Read the official data policy before using Grammarly for sensitive content (legal drafts, medical records, regulated communications).
• Generative quotas can be hit faster than users expect, especially on free or low-tier plans. Verify limits directly before committing the team to a workflow.
• Plagiarism and AI-content disclosure norms vary across schools, publishers, and platforms. Compliance is the writer's responsibility, not Grammarly's.

Alternatives

• ChatGPT — better if you want a powerful general-purpose chat assistant for ideation and longer drafting, and you are willing to copy/paste between apps.
• Notion AI — better if your docs already live in Notion and you want AI drafting inside that workspace instead of inside email and browser fields.
• Jasper — better if you are a marketing team that needs templated, brand-voice-aware content production at scale.

Buyer control and the review boundary

If you are evaluating Grammarly (AI) as a buyer rather than a casual writer, the deciding question is less "can it fix grammar and draft text?" than "which of your writing context, brand voice, and outgoing messages does Grammarly shape, and where does the review boundary sit before its suggestions become customer-facing text?" These are the durable control questions to ask. <span id="grammarly-ai-review-boundary-2026-06-28"></span>

• Control what writing context Grammarly sees. Grammarly works in-line across browser fields, email, documents, and chat — so it reads the text you type wherever you type it. Decide up front which surfaces, accounts, and document types it may operate inside before you roll it out across a team, rather than enabling it everywhere by default; some writing contexts (sensitive, regulated, or confidential) may belong outside its reach.
• Set the style and brand guardrails deliberately. Grammarly's clarity, tone, and rewrite suggestions nudge how your writing sounds. Decide whose voice and which style or brand-voice rules it should enforce, and who can change them, before writers adopt it — rather than letting one-click accepts quietly flatten everyone's voice into the default.
• Human review before text becomes customer-facing. Treat any Grammarly suggestion or generated draft — an email reply, an announcement, a published doc — as a draft, not finished copy. Name who reads and edits it for voice, accuracy, and disclosure norms before it is sent or published. The vendor's positioning is not a guarantee about any specific output, as Cons and caveats describes.
• Route the comparison to the right page. When the real question is Grammarly (AI) versus another tool for a specific job, follow the workflow-fit decision paths below — for example Grammarly AI vs Jasper or Notion AI vs Grammarly AI — or browse the AI Writing & Editing category to scope the field before deciding who controls what.

Evergreen decision framing only. No price, plan, quota, model-availability, benchmark, ranking, speed, accuracy, superiority, or legal claim is made here; verify current plan inclusions, brand-voice and admin controls, and data-handling terms on Grammarly's official pages, and confirm how Grammarly fits your team's review process against your own practice.

Where to compare Grammarly AI next

If Grammarly AI is on your shortlist, the next question is usually "against what, and for which job?" These side-by-side pages are organized by workflow fit, not by a winner — each one walks through where one tool's shape suits a particular task better than the other. Grammarly AI's job is writing-quality and editing assistance, so the most direct comparisons are other writing tools; the cross-category links below are included for completeness but are not direct substitutes.

Same job — writing quality, tone, and editing:

• Notion AI vs Grammarly AI — when the deciding factor is whether your drafting should live inside a Notion workspace or follow you across the apps where you already type.
• Grammarly AI vs Jasper — when you are weighing in-line editing help against a templated, campaign-oriented marketing-content workflow.
• Grammarly AI vs Microsoft Copilot — when the question is a dedicated writing-assistance layer versus an assistant that lives inside the Microsoft 365 suite.
• Claude vs Grammarly AI — when you are choosing between a general reasoning-and-drafting assistant and an in-place grammar/clarity/tone layer for the writing you already do.

Cross-category — different primary job, included for orientation, not as substitutes:

• Gemini vs Grammarly AI — a broad general-purpose assistant versus a focused writing-editing layer; useful only if you are deciding which category you actually need.
• Zapier AI vs Grammarly AI — automation/workflow-connecting work is a different category from writing assistance; compare here only if you are unsure which problem you are solving.
• GitHub Copilot vs Grammarly AI — code completion is a separate job from prose editing; this page is for readers triaging between the two categories, not picking a writing tool.
• Grammarly AI vs Cursor — an AI code editor versus a writing assistant; different categories, included only for category-level orientation.
• Grammarly AI vs Replit AI — in-IDE coding help versus prose editing; another cross-category reference, not a like-for-like writing comparison.

To browse the whole field rather than a single head-to-head, start from the AI Writing & Editing category; for the productivity-and-automation angle, see AI Productivity & Automation. These links are decision paths, not rankings — no benchmark, price, quota, speed, accuracy, or model-availability claim is made here; the comparison pages route any such specifics to the official sources.

Who should not use Grammarly (AI)

• Users who only want a chatbot. Grammarly's strength is in-place writing assistance, not standalone chat.
• Teams whose policy prohibits sending text content to third-party AI providers.
• Workflows where the bottleneck is research and citation, not drafting and editing.

Author selection rubric

Choose Grammarly (AI) when at least two of these are true:

• Most of your writing happens inside the browser or inside common office apps, not inside a single dedicated writing app.
• You want a single tool to handle grammar, clarity, tone, and light generative drafting.
• You are willing to verify and respect plan-specific generative quotas.

Avoid Grammarly (AI) when any of these are true:

• Your main need is long, structured drafting that benefits from a dedicated chat assistant.
• Your organization's data policy prohibits third-party processing of the text you'd be checking.
• You want a marketing-content workflow with templates and campaigns — that is a different category.

Sources

• Official AI feature page: https://www.grammarly.com/ai — recorded as src-grammarly-ai-2026-05-21 in data/sources.json with access_status = ok.
• Official plans page: https://www.grammarly.com/plans — recorded as src-grammarly-plans-2026-05-22 in data/sources.json with access_status = ok after a 2026-05-22 page-body read; this is the source for every plan name, price, and generative-AI quota quoted on this page.
• Official AI product + plans reachability recheck (2026-06-13): https://www.grammarly.com/ai (title "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly") and https://www.grammarly.com/plans (title "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", h1 "Great Writing Starts With a Plan") — recorded as src-grammarly-ai-plans-2026-06-13 in data/sources.json with access_status = ok after a 2026-06-13 KST HTTP 200 read; source of the "Source-freshness note (2026-06-13)" section, supporting only official AI-page/plans-page reachability, titles, and durable positioning markers (Free/Pro/Enterprise tier names visible; no amounts disclosed on the page). Used as vendor evidence only; no price, quota, plan-entitlement, model-availability, benchmark, ranking, speed, or superiority claim is drawn from it.
• Official AI product + plans + business reachability recheck (2026-06-19): https://www.grammarly.com/ai (title "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly", body-sample SHA-256 prefix 9907a1ece5b1b685), https://www.grammarly.com/plans (title "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", SHA-256 prefix d2b49a51304f61b5), and https://www.grammarly.com/business (title "Grammarly for Business | AI Writing Assistance for Teams of all Sizes", h1 "Grammarly for Teams & Businesses", SHA-256 prefix ac4fc6663b25f3c4) — recorded as src-grammarly-ai-plans-business-2026-06-19 in data/sources.json with access_status = ok after a 2026-06-19 KST HTTP 200 read; source of the "Source-freshness note (2026-06-19)" section, supporting only official AI/plans/business-page reachability, titles, and h1 markers. Used as vendor evidence only; no price, quota, plan-entitlement, model-availability, benchmark, ranking, speed, accuracy, or superiority claim is drawn from it.
• Official AI product + plans + business + enterprise reachability recheck (2026-06-25): https://www.grammarly.com/ai (title "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly", body SHA-256 prefix af6ee711b457d363), https://www.grammarly.com/plans (title "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", h1 "Great Writing Starts With a Plan", SHA-256 prefix 59ceec3c67dfd113), https://www.grammarly.com/business (title "Grammarly for Business | AI Writing Assistance for Teams of all Sizes", h1 "Grammarly for Teams & Businesses", SHA-256 prefix 22b2dff180b27376), and https://www.grammarly.com/enterprise (final URL https://www.grammarly.com/business/enterprise, title "Grammarly for Enterprise", h1 "For Enterprise", SHA-256 prefix 78f26c18dcb019ed) — recorded as src-grammarly-ai-plans-business-enterprise-2026-06-25 in data/sources.json with access_status = ok after a 2026-06-25 KST HTTP 200 read logged in data/grammarly-source-gate-2026-06-25.json / .md; source of the "Source-freshness note (2026-06-25)" section, supporting only official AI/plans/business/enterprise-page reachability, titles, and h1 markers. Used as vendor evidence only; no price, quota, plan-entitlement, model-availability, benchmark, ranking, speed, accuracy, or superiority claim is drawn from it.

Internal links (at least 3)

• Category pages: /ai-writing/, /ai-productivity/
• Alternative tool: /tools/notion-ai/
• Comparison pages (writing): /compare/notion-ai-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-jasper/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-microsoft-copilot/, /compare/claude-vs-grammarly-ai/
• Comparison pages (cross-category, not direct substitutes): /compare/gemini-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/zapier-ai-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/github-copilot-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-cursor/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-replit-ai/

Disclosure

• Affiliate links: none.
• Sponsored content: none. Grammarly Inc. has no relationship to this page.
• Generative AI assistance: this draft was assembled with the help of an AI assistant working from the HMP source records.

Trademark notice

Grammarly is a trademark of Grammarly Inc. Use here is referential only and does not imply endorsement, partnership, or affiliation.

Update log

• 2026-06-28 (buyer-control / review-boundary qualified-traffic increment — LOCAL source/content edit only, NOT a new revenue page/product and NOT a deploy): added one compact, evergreen "## Buyer control and the review boundary" section placed after "## Alternatives" and before "## Where to compare Grammarly AI next", carrying durable marker grammarly-ai-review-boundary-2026-06-28 as a single <span id="grammarly-ai-review-boundary-2026-06-28"></span> in the section's lead. It frames Grammarly (AI) buying around buyer control over which writing context/surfaces Grammarly operates inside, setting the style/brand guardrails deliberately, human review before a suggestion or generated draft becomes customer-facing text, and routing tool-vs-tool questions to the existing comparison pages (/compare/grammarly-ai-vs-jasper/, /compare/notion-ai-vs-grammarly-ai/), the in-page #cons-and-caveats anchor, and the /ai-writing/ category already on this page. Existing page/source context only — no web fetch and no data/* edit; no new price/quota/plan/model-availability/ranking/benchmark/speed/accuracy/superiority/legal claim; no Gumroad/UTM/affiliate/sponsored/coupon/checkout link; data/tools.json and last_verified_at unchanged; content_type/content_status stay tool_page/qa_passed. Local-only increment; no build/deploy performed — live verify/build is handled separately by Hermes.
• 2026-06-25 (source-freshness refresh — local source recheck, NOT a new revenue page): added a compact "Source-freshness note (2026-06-25)" section after the "Source-freshness note (2026-06-19)" section (before "## What is Grammarly (AI)?"), framing Grammarly as an in-workflow individual writing/review surface plus a separate team/enterprise review/buying path, emphasizing verifying plans/entitlements/security at the source, keeping a human in the review loop, and noting vendor evidence only. Evidence: 2026-06-25 KST HTTP 200 reads logged in data/grammarly-source-gate-2026-06-25.json / .md — https://www.grammarly.com/ai (title "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly", body SHA-256 prefix af6ee711b457d363), https://www.grammarly.com/plans (title "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", h1 "Great Writing Starts With a Plan", prefix 59ceec3c67dfd113), https://www.grammarly.com/business (title "Grammarly for Business | AI Writing Assistance for Teams of all Sizes", h1 "Grammarly for Teams & Businesses", prefix 22b2dff180b27376), and https://www.grammarly.com/enterprise (final URL https://www.grammarly.com/business/enterprise, title "Grammarly for Enterprise", h1 "For Enterprise", prefix 78f26c18dcb019ed). One new source added (src-grammarly-ai-plans-business-enterprise-2026-06-25, source_type = official_homepage, access_status = ok) and listed in the page Sources and the grammarly-ai sources_used. Vendor evidence only, not an independent ranking. No benchmark/ranking/price/quota/plan-entitlement/speed/accuracy/model-availability/superiority claim added; price and plan rows unchanged; no Gumroad/UTM/affiliate/sponsored/coupon link added; data/tools.json and last_verified_at unchanged. content_type/content_status stay tool_page/qa_passed. Local-only increment; Hermes verifies/builds/deploys/live-smokes separately.
• 2026-06-19 (source-freshness refresh — local source recheck, NOT a new revenue page): added a compact "Source-freshness note (2026-06-19)" section after the "Source-freshness note (2026-06-13)" section (before "## What is Grammarly (AI)?"), framing Grammarly's individual vs. team/business surfaces as separate, emphasizing verifying plans/entitlements at the source, keeping a human in the review loop, and noting vendor evidence only. Evidence: 2026-06-19 KST HTTP 200 reads of https://www.grammarly.com/ai (title "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly", h1 "AI at Grammarly", body-sample SHA-256 prefix 9907a1ece5b1b685), https://www.grammarly.com/plans (title "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly", SHA-256 prefix d2b49a51304f61b5), and https://www.grammarly.com/business (title "Grammarly for Business | AI Writing Assistance for Teams of all Sizes", h1 "Grammarly for Teams & Businesses", SHA-256 prefix ac4fc6663b25f3c4). One new source added (src-grammarly-ai-plans-business-2026-06-19, source_type = official_homepage, access_status = ok) and listed in the page Sources and the grammarly-ai sources_used. Vendor evidence only, not an independent ranking. No benchmark/ranking/price/quota/plan-entitlement/speed/accuracy/model-availability/superiority claim added; price and plan rows unchanged; no Gumroad/UTM/affiliate/sponsored/coupon link added; data/tools.json and last_verified_at unchanged. content_type/content_status stay tool_page/qa_passed. Revenue inventory unchanged (18 tool + 51 comparison = 69 qa_passed pages). Hermes completed the canonical production build, Cloudflare live deploy, and exact route/body smoke on 2026-06-19 KST; live /tools/grammarly-ai/ contains the 2026-06-19 marker and source id.
• 2026-05-22 (draft): first local draft created from templates/tool-page-template.md. content_status = drafted.
• 2026-05-22 (qa pass): live page-body read of https://www.grammarly.com/plans added concrete Free/Pro/Enterprise plan names, prices, and per-tier generative-AI prompt quotas (100 / 2,000 / unlimited). New source entry added (src-grammarly-plans-2026-05-22, access_status = ok). data/tools.json pricing_summary, has_free_plan = true, confidence_score, and last_verified_at refreshed. Section A1/A2 of qa/adsense-seo-quality-gate.md now satisfied. content_status advanced to qa_passed.
• 2026-06-13 (source-freshness refresh — local source, NOT a new revenue page): added a compact "Source-freshness note (2026-06-13)" section after "## Quick verdict" (before "## What is Grammarly (AI)?"), framing Grammarly (AI) as an in-workflow writing/review surface from Grammarly's official AI product page and plans page (src-grammarly-ai-plans-2026-06-13, access_status = ok after 2026-06-13 KST HTTP 200 reads of https://www.grammarly.com/ai — title "Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Grammarly" — and https://www.grammarly.com/plans — title "Grammarly Prices and Plans | Grammarly"). Covers workflow fit, keeping a human in the review loop, and verifying plans on the official page — vendor evidence only, no independent ranking. Added one source to data/sources.json and the grammarly-ai sources_used. No pricing/plan row changed; no benchmark, ranking, price, quota, plan-entitlement, speed, model-availability, or superiority claim added; no Gumroad/UTM/affiliate/sponsored/coupon link added; data/tools.json and last_verified_at unchanged. Revenue inventory unchanged (18 tool + 51 comparison = 69 qa_passed pages). Hermes later built, deployed, and live-smoked this source-freshness note on aistackdb.com; it is no longer a current local-ready/deploy gate.
• 2026-06-03 (internal-link/traffic refresh — LOCAL, production-refresh-ready, NOT a new revenue page): added a "Where to compare Grammarly AI next" section (placed after "## Alternatives", before "## Who should not use Grammarly (AI)") linking nine qa_passed comparison pages that involve Grammarly AI — four same-category writing comparisons (/compare/notion-ai-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-jasper/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-microsoft-copilot/, /compare/claude-vs-grammarly-ai/) and five explicitly cross-category, not-direct-substitute references (/compare/gemini-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/zapier-ai-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/github-copilot-vs-grammarly-ai/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-cursor/, /compare/grammarly-ai-vs-replit-ai/) — plus the /ai-writing/ and /ai-productivity/ category browse pages, framed as workflow-fit decision paths rather than rankings. Updated the "Internal links" rows to list these routes. No source was fetched and no volatile claim was added: no benchmark, ranking, price, quota, speed, accuracy, or model-availability fact is asserted, and no commercial, affiliate, sponsored, coupon, or tracking-parameter CTA was added to this page. data/sources.json, data/tools.json, and last_verified_at are unchanged. Revenue inventory unchanged (18 tool + 51 comparison = 69 qa_passed pages). Hermes later built, deployed, and live-smoked this internal-link refresh on aistackdb.com; it is no longer a current local-only/deploy gate.