AI Disclosure and Source Policy

Pre-publication draft. Replace bracketed placeholders before publishing. See content/site-pages/README.md for the placeholder list.

This page explains two related things: how AI tools are used in producing content on https://aistackdb.com/, and how the site verifies and cites its sources. The two are linked because the most important guardrail against AI hallucination on a tools-and-software site is a strict source-verification rule.

This policy is the public version of the rules enforced internally by qa/adsense-seo-quality-gate.md in this project's repository.

AI assistance disclosure

AI tools — including general-purpose AI assistants, AI writing tools, AI coding tools, and AI research tools — may be used during research, drafting, restructuring, fact-checking suggestions, and copy editing of pages on this site. This use is not hidden. It is disclosed here, and where AI assistance is material to a specific page, an additional note appears on that page.

What AI tools are used for:

What AI tools are not used for:

Editorial responsibility for every published page sits with the operator 루모메이트(LumoMate), regardless of which tools assisted in drafting.

Source policy

Source quality is the single biggest determinant of whether a page is allowed to leave drafted status. The rules are:

Official sources are required

Every page must cite at least one official source (the vendor's own domain) and at least two sources in total. Third-party references can supplement but cannot replace an official source for product-specific facts.

Sources are recorded centrally

Every source cited on the site is also entered in data/sources.json with:

This means a reader can audit, in principle, every fact on the site against a source record that includes when it was last verified and what it actually supports.

Unverified sources are not quoted

Any source whose access_status is needs_verification, blocked, not_found, or unknown is not quoted as fact on a page. If such a source is the only reference available, the page directs the reader to verify on the vendor's official site rather than restating a claim.

Pricing sources have a stricter bar

Pricing is the most volatile claim a tool page can carry, so:

Brand assets follow a separate licensing rule

Logos, screenshots, mascots, and brand assets are not used without an explicit license. This is a separate rule from text citation. A page may name a product in text without using its logo. If you are a rights-holder and believe an unauthorized asset has been used, see the Contact page for the takedown route.

Corrections to AI-assisted content

If a reader believes an AI-assisted page contains an error of fact, the correction route is the same as for any other page: send the page URL, the specific claim, and a link to the official source that supports the correct value to corrections@aistackdb.com. Corrections backed by an official source are applied as soon as the operator has verified the source. When the correction materially changes a recommendation, the page is downgraded in content/content-status.json until it passes the gate again.

Why the policy is this strict

A site about AI and SaaS tools has a specific failure mode: an AI tool, used carelessly, will produce a confident-sounding paragraph that paraphrases vendor marketing copy and invents a plausible-looking price. That paragraph is exactly the content type that quality-evaluator systems and ad networks are trained to suppress, and it is also the content type that costs a reader real money when acted on.

The cure is not to avoid AI tools. The cure is to bind every published claim to an official source that has been read, recorded, and dated, and to disclose where AI assistance was used so a reader can apply appropriate skepticism. That is the bargain this policy makes.

Related pages

Update log